
All models will be available in march with flex options.
I'll post the complete specs soon.
Moderator: Pierre Gravel
No, his shape is exactly the same.Eric Brammer wrote:Pierre, did Claude re-shape the tail? It looks a bit different than what I recall from last season's Gathering.
Here are some bad pics but they may give you a better idea of the camber and concave.Eric Brammer wrote:In dimensions, etc., veiws from different angles would be great, as to see the camber/concave, as that tends to be where boards get their 'feel', both in terms of flex response, and shaping underfoot. I hate buying into something 'blind' from online.
Totally true PSR, at Kebbek we prefer a little more weight that give the board a lot more durability and cost effectiveness. I'm really proud of our slalom boards now. After 3 years of riding prototypes we got them right.Eric Brammer wrote:Mr. Ritschard, keep in mind that Weight going Downhill isn't a BAD thing! Some of BLR crew at Morro Bay last year actually had weights added on the G.S. boards... Hmm.?.
Also, lighter weights often mean less durability. Luckily, I've only dropped my Turner Fullnose once, and it landed on it's wheels. My Roe, I handle that with care, always.
Thanks for the kind words.Cole Dano wrote:Have the widths of the boards changed a bit for 2006?
I just ordered a few from a dealer in Germany
Claude Regnier Pro
28.5 x 7.5"
Pierre Gravel Pro
31.125 x 7.625"
Kebbek Team GS
30" x 9
GS has no concave and a decent amount of camber, the other two have the same concave pictured above and a mild camber.
They are all very well built i must say.