![Image](http://www.slalomskateboarder.com/Boards/Other/MikeJ_scamber.jpg)
oh yeah 17 1/2 wheelbase 23" long 9 1/2 wide seismic 110's and flashies.
Moderator: Marion Karr
Mike, check out Glenn's upside downside. it's definately a reality check but i tell you, more get's done thinking for yourself tooling along BUT if we don't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it.Mike Johnson wrote:Adam, thanks for the advice, unfortunately my slalom gear is always done on a budget so the 110's will have to stay on for the near future at least but yes the length of the deck does tend to make the rear a little whippy but i think if i extend it a little say 30" length and kill the rear with a new school truck i've got hanging around it should be quite a lively but stable beast. I've just had an afternoon skating around on it and its so turny its scary.
I've done an s-camber pool version that doesn't work at all for some reason and the DH prototype is being ridden by Luke Wetherall, a UK Downhiller, but what I really want to get wired is a deck that acts as a rocket for fast acceleration on a course with little effort....kind of like a deck which makes "average" riders competitive. That camber at the back is real sick, you can actually feel it push the deck through a pump.Leonardo Ojeda wrote: That longer version looks sick, maybe u have something in your hands going on, now try a pool version and a DH one :)leo