Just realized this topic was better for this post.
Andy Bittner, I agree with you. It's just that I'am more into the "I don't care what it stands for" it's just 2 skill level groups. I think most of us are. Otherwise we wouldn't have these 2 namings. In Europe this is new. There where never slalom competitions using Pro/Am before. There was only one "group" so there was no use putting a name to it. I think this Pro/Am was used mainly in the States. I always looked at it as if you where sponsorded you where Pro. If not you where Am. But what do I know. What was the American organizers definition?
This is according to the dictionaries...
Pro
1. A professional, especially in sports.
2. An expert in a field of endeavor.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Professional
1a. Of, relating to, engaged in, or suitable for a profession: lawyers, doctors, and other professional people.
1b. Conforming to the standards of a profession: professional behavior.
2. Engaging in a given activity as a source of livelihood or as a career: a professional writer.
3. Performed by persons receiving pay: professional football.
4. Having or showing great skill; expert: a professional repair job.
n.
1. A person following a profession, especially a learned profession.
2. One who earns a living in a given or implied occupation: hired a professional to decorate the house.
3. A skilled practitioner; an expert.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
You tell me what it means? The only thing I know is that definitions are never easy and clear. It's always depending of how you look at it, using dictionaries or not.
AM/Open or PRO
Moderators: Jonathan Harms, Robert Thiele
-
Hans Koraeus
- Corky - World Ranking Supervisor
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
-
John Gilmour
- Team Roe Racing
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: USA
Sometimes being a pro means you'll travel a great distance ....but only if you think there is cash on the line.
I look at it this way. If the whole package is great and not too hard to get to- I'll go if there is no cash to compete for.
If something is missing in Venue (lame hill, bad surface, not so good course, no spectators, etc....) and the cost/difficulty to go for me is high, there should be cash to motivate me to go.
I think if there was cash to be won at Da' farm we would have something perhaps as a draw for those far away... I think there should be a separate cash purse from the charity .....strangely enough....you might be able to raise more for charity that way....or how about some cash prizes for the Kids class?
BTW...its not banning the Canadians- Joe..... its the Mexicans- Carasco's gonna love 'da farm.
I look at it this way. If the whole package is great and not too hard to get to- I'll go if there is no cash to compete for.
If something is missing in Venue (lame hill, bad surface, not so good course, no spectators, etc....) and the cost/difficulty to go for me is high, there should be cash to motivate me to go.
I think if there was cash to be won at Da' farm we would have something perhaps as a draw for those far away... I think there should be a separate cash purse from the charity .....strangely enough....you might be able to raise more for charity that way....or how about some cash prizes for the Kids class?
BTW...its not banning the Canadians- Joe..... its the Mexicans- Carasco's gonna love 'da farm.
One good turn deserves another
john gilmour
john gilmour
-
Hans Koraeus
- Corky - World Ranking Supervisor
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
In golf (for what it's worth) to qualify for the US Open....the rules state....
Entries are open to professional golfers and amateur golfers with up-to-date USGA Handicap Indexes not exceeding 1.4 under the Men's USGA Handicap System.
Entries are subject to rejection at any time (including during the Championship) by the USGA. The reason for rejection may include unbecoming conduct. (You got that Kenny)
So in theory, dafarm could be an open event with limited participants based on an Open qualifying system (or handicapping system) that is yet to be established. There would have to be regional races etc.......
Show me the money!!
How about this Wesley...DaFarm is an Open Invitational open to the first 50 racers who sign up...
Or
DaFarm is an Invitational inviting the first 50 racers that sign up to attend.
Entries are open to professional golfers and amateur golfers with up-to-date USGA Handicap Indexes not exceeding 1.4 under the Men's USGA Handicap System.
Entries are subject to rejection at any time (including during the Championship) by the USGA. The reason for rejection may include unbecoming conduct. (You got that Kenny)
So in theory, dafarm could be an open event with limited participants based on an Open qualifying system (or handicapping system) that is yet to be established. There would have to be regional races etc.......
Show me the money!!
How about this Wesley...DaFarm is an Open Invitational open to the first 50 racers who sign up...
Or
DaFarm is an Invitational inviting the first 50 racers that sign up to attend.
i wish people would use the PROPER meanings of words while using them. Once a pro, ALWAYS a pro, or at least never an amatuer again( i have NEVER seen a pro boxer go AM again even though there are some AM boxers that could hang with the pro world champs).. If a pro falls off, and slows down, then he/she is just that, a slow pro.
if you want the best and the rest go with A class and B class
if you want pro's racing pro's and am's racing am's, go with PRO class and AM class and keep them seperated.
if you just don't care, go with OPEN (just don't limit the number of racers, b/c that is NOT open)
simple, yet effective..
K.I.S.S.
if you want the best and the rest go with A class and B class
if you want pro's racing pro's and am's racing am's, go with PRO class and AM class and keep them seperated.
if you just don't care, go with OPEN (just don't limit the number of racers, b/c that is NOT open)
simple, yet effective..
K.I.S.S.
"You can go a long way with a smile. You can go a lot farther with a
smile and a gun."
- Al Capone
smile and a gun."
- Al Capone
-
Hans Koraeus
- Corky - World Ranking Supervisor
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
As I said I only see Pro and Am as 2 groups, the best and the rest. They are not Pro's or Am's in the real meaning. It is a good naming though when you only have two groups.
As seen this season and in the above post how long will we be able to stay with 2 groups? The day we get too many skaters wanting to compete in slalom competitions maybe we will start using a 3:rd group. Then the Pro/Am ideology doesn't work anymore. In all other sports having this problem I have never seen group A, group B a.s.o. I don't know for sure what they use in baseball, ice-hockey, football and soccer. Premiere league style, First division style, Series style, Tour style, Cup style or whatever.
Time will tell what will happen on the skateboard slalom scene. If this sport explodes (I'm dreaming) we will probably invent another system than the current one.
As seen this season and in the above post how long will we be able to stay with 2 groups? The day we get too many skaters wanting to compete in slalom competitions maybe we will start using a 3:rd group. Then the Pro/Am ideology doesn't work anymore. In all other sports having this problem I have never seen group A, group B a.s.o. I don't know for sure what they use in baseball, ice-hockey, football and soccer. Premiere league style, First division style, Series style, Tour style, Cup style or whatever.
Time will tell what will happen on the skateboard slalom scene. If this sport explodes (I'm dreaming) we will probably invent another system than the current one.
-
Wesley Tucker
- 1961-2013 (RIP)
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:00 am
-
Andy Bittner
- GBJ
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Alright, Tway... you beat on curling, but picked up the semi-obscure (at least in these parts) golf reference.
...and while we're at it, let's contact all of the major English language dictionaries to inform them that we're re-defining the words "professional" and "amateur" to mean "good" and "somehow, not as good".
The way I see it is that, if barely-professional (by the REAL definition) athletes need to call themselves "pro", because "calling them group A and B sounds... well, B"... that seems pretty weak in and of itself. It's like building castles in the sand; you may feel like you've accomplished something, but it really doesn't mean that much and probably won't last. I think slalom skateboarding should worry about a professional class when it's a sport that can support a professional class. Until then, calling your/ourselves pros is just mental masturbation.
...and while we're at it, let's contact all of the major English language dictionaries to inform them that we're re-defining the words "professional" and "amateur" to mean "good" and "somehow, not as good".
The way I see it is that, if barely-professional (by the REAL definition) athletes need to call themselves "pro", because "calling them group A and B sounds... well, B"... that seems pretty weak in and of itself. It's like building castles in the sand; you may feel like you've accomplished something, but it really doesn't mean that much and probably won't last. I think slalom skateboarding should worry about a professional class when it's a sport that can support a professional class. Until then, calling your/ourselves pros is just mental masturbation.
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
-
Hans Koraeus
- Corky - World Ranking Supervisor
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
I know we missuse the words Pro and Am. For me it is only to separate two groups of racers. Group A: The best and group B: the rest. It's just that calling them group A and B sounds... well, B.
I think people understand better the idea by using the words Pro and Am.
Some of the better Am's often do results that would go well in the Pro group. This is often because you want to win some Am competitions before you start competing as a Pro. Maybe even wanting to go for the World Am title. Soon enough the Am winners all go over to the Pro class. I don't think we have got a missuse of people staying in Am class just to win.
A bigger problem is when someone who has raced Pro want to back down. The saying is that "Once a Pro always a Pro". I personally don't think so. I think you should be able to select the group that best reflect your skill. This is sensible though and winners of Am may easily be looked upon as sandbaggers. Maybe everyone should be forced to openly declare if they want to run as Pro or Am before each season for each discipline.
I think people understand better the idea by using the words Pro and Am.
Some of the better Am's often do results that would go well in the Pro group. This is often because you want to win some Am competitions before you start competing as a Pro. Maybe even wanting to go for the World Am title. Soon enough the Am winners all go over to the Pro class. I don't think we have got a missuse of people staying in Am class just to win.
A bigger problem is when someone who has raced Pro want to back down. The saying is that "Once a Pro always a Pro". I personally don't think so. I think you should be able to select the group that best reflect your skill. This is sensible though and winners of Am may easily be looked upon as sandbaggers. Maybe everyone should be forced to openly declare if they want to run as Pro or Am before each season for each discipline.
-
Andy Bittner
- GBJ
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Pro or Am
I know I'm often the odd man out on things like this, and at the same time I'm going to try to bring this topic back on subject.
I think that we should stop trying to re-write the definitions of the words "Pro" (or "Professional") and "Amateur".
An Amateur is a person who prefers, for any reason, to not race for money or substantially valuable prizes.
A Pro is a person who chooses to attempt to make some money back out of their racing efforts, either in winnings or through the marketing of themselves as a member of the sport's professional ranks. In truth, a REAL professional is someone who makes a substantial portion of their living out of the pursuit in which they claim to be professional. So, what that means is that there really are no professional slalom skateboarders, no matter what we call them ourselves. There is also a sense in many other sports that those who choose to be professionals, trading on the success or marketability of a sport, should also be relied upon more heavily to support that sport, whether that be in larger event entry fees, promotional appearances, charity support or teaching.
This'll seem silly at first, because, to some degree, it defies logic, but... being professional or amateur really has nothing to do with ability. Of course, it'd be stupid to actually attempt to be a professional at something if you sucked at it, but, in my opinion, being great at something does not and never should obligate an athlete to declare himself a professional.
Certainly times have changed, but there was once a time, not that long ago, when world-class amateur athletes were revered far and above their professional counterparts. In a certain case that was referred to as "The Olympic Ideal", and in other sports, certain amateurs are still revered as the greatest, most formidable and most reknowned competitors in the sport's history. There was a general sense that someone who competed as an amateur harbored a purer, more genuine love for a sport, than did someone who saw it also as a meal ticket.
So, relative to the topic, I think...
Professional should mean Professional
Amateur should mean Amateur and
Open should mean Open (to any)
I imagine there will always be sucky professionals, I hope there will always be great amateurs, and I wish slalom skateboard race organizers would use the word Open correctly.
I think that we should stop trying to re-write the definitions of the words "Pro" (or "Professional") and "Amateur".
An Amateur is a person who prefers, for any reason, to not race for money or substantially valuable prizes.
A Pro is a person who chooses to attempt to make some money back out of their racing efforts, either in winnings or through the marketing of themselves as a member of the sport's professional ranks. In truth, a REAL professional is someone who makes a substantial portion of their living out of the pursuit in which they claim to be professional. So, what that means is that there really are no professional slalom skateboarders, no matter what we call them ourselves. There is also a sense in many other sports that those who choose to be professionals, trading on the success or marketability of a sport, should also be relied upon more heavily to support that sport, whether that be in larger event entry fees, promotional appearances, charity support or teaching.
This'll seem silly at first, because, to some degree, it defies logic, but... being professional or amateur really has nothing to do with ability. Of course, it'd be stupid to actually attempt to be a professional at something if you sucked at it, but, in my opinion, being great at something does not and never should obligate an athlete to declare himself a professional.
Certainly times have changed, but there was once a time, not that long ago, when world-class amateur athletes were revered far and above their professional counterparts. In a certain case that was referred to as "The Olympic Ideal", and in other sports, certain amateurs are still revered as the greatest, most formidable and most reknowned competitors in the sport's history. There was a general sense that someone who competed as an amateur harbored a purer, more genuine love for a sport, than did someone who saw it also as a meal ticket.
So, relative to the topic, I think...
Professional should mean Professional
Amateur should mean Amateur and
Open should mean Open (to any)
I imagine there will always be sucky professionals, I hope there will always be great amateurs, and I wish slalom skateboard race organizers would use the word Open correctly.
-
Jack Smith
- Morro Bay Skate legend
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Morro Bay, California
- Contact:
oops
My fault, Joe. Guess I'm still a bit gun shy. Looking forward to seeing you also.
-
Mike Cividino
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
-
Joe Iacovelli
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Bristol, CT
America's Cup
Jack,
I thought from the tenor of my post all would know that I was kidding. I can't tell you how excited I am about the series or about the fact that my home race, Da Farm! is in the series. It is a definite boost to what is already a "high spirits" event.
I'll delete my joke.
My family and I look forward to seeing you in Luna,
Joe
PS: I'm working with Dennis Conner on a new rigid sail and hull design to sneak up on that America's Cup.
I thought from the tenor of my post all would know that I was kidding. I can't tell you how excited I am about the series or about the fact that my home race, Da Farm! is in the series. It is a definite boost to what is already a "high spirits" event.
I'll delete my joke.
My family and I look forward to seeing you in Luna,
Joe
PS: I'm working with Dennis Conner on a new rigid sail and hull design to sneak up on that America's Cup.
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
-
Jack Smith
- Morro Bay Skate legend
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Morro Bay, California
- Contact:
American Cup
Joe,
"Come out and see if racing for America's Cup points kills the vibe. "
Yep, that's why we developed it!
"Come out and see if racing for America's Cup points kills the vibe. "
Yep, that's why we developed it!
-
Joe Iacovelli
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Bristol, CT
Da Farm
Don't forget free beer and oysters.
Will there be less drinking the night before?
Will Twang and Twig finally come to fisticuffs?
Will Sandy call imigration on Ilva?
Does anyone really believe Gilmour was taken out by a tree?
Can we ban the Canadians this year (seriously)?
Joe Iacovelli
Team Chigger
Will there be less drinking the night before?
Will Twang and Twig finally come to fisticuffs?
Will Sandy call imigration on Ilva?
Does anyone really believe Gilmour was taken out by a tree?
Can we ban the Canadians this year (seriously)?
Joe Iacovelli
Team Chigger
Last edited by Joe Iacovelli on Wed Apr 07, 2004 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
-
Troy Smart
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Hampton Bays, NY
-
Troy Smart
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Hampton Bays, NY
I would like to see "Da Farm" race be just a race.
1st, 2nd, 3rd and on down the line.
No "A-Pro/B-Pro" bullshit.
At this time in slalom, most of us are newbies.
Slalom is growing somewhat.
There are a lot of "open" class racers that are faster than most "Pros".
Let "Da Farm" be a place where they can show it.
A major race that attracts major talent where open and pro class racers can race each other.
That should be "Da Farm" way.
Open and Pro class racers hand in hand. (que: "We've only just Begun" by the Carpenters).
1st, 2nd, 3rd and on down the line.
No "A-Pro/B-Pro" bullshit.
At this time in slalom, most of us are newbies.
Slalom is growing somewhat.
There are a lot of "open" class racers that are faster than most "Pros".
Let "Da Farm" be a place where they can show it.
A major race that attracts major talent where open and pro class racers can race each other.
That should be "Da Farm" way.
Open and Pro class racers hand in hand. (que: "We've only just Begun" by the Carpenters).
-
Vlad Popov
- Moscow-Washington
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
Again, it makes sense, Mr. Tway. I've seen a few examples of good PRO/OPEN comprimises. DC, The Farm and MS.
If pros have more speed on the start, they'll ride a totally different course...on the same course.
I think it's better for the World Cups and other Major Comps to have whatever they can fit depending on # of people, time limits and the weather.
If pros have more speed on the start, they'll ride a totally different course...on the same course.
I think it's better for the World Cups and other Major Comps to have whatever they can fit depending on # of people, time limits and the weather.
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
One size fits all
One Size Fits All?
At least at the farm, TK does his best to set a course that is very difficult for fast racers (pros) and makeable for open riders. Racers qualify on both the GS and TS courses alike. In my brief history of slalom racing, all the courses I have raced have been the same for Pros and Ams. Unfortunately, time is always a factor and it's always against the organizers so we do our best to accommodate everyone....which is pretty much impossible. Everyone has their course preferences… I for one enjoy super tight but most racers don't...so we have to compromise. Give and take. It sucks to see people get upset when a course is too easy or hard when it’s all about having fun. Slalom needs a ton of support if it's ever to make it into the masses which I have mixed feelings about. I like the club feel we have now but would also like to see this shit on Wide World of Sports someday instead of Curling. (No disrespect intended GBJ).
It doesn't make sense for everyone to quality on one open course.
At least at the farm, TK does his best to set a course that is very difficult for fast racers (pros) and makeable for open riders. Racers qualify on both the GS and TS courses alike. In my brief history of slalom racing, all the courses I have raced have been the same for Pros and Ams. Unfortunately, time is always a factor and it's always against the organizers so we do our best to accommodate everyone....which is pretty much impossible. Everyone has their course preferences… I for one enjoy super tight but most racers don't...so we have to compromise. Give and take. It sucks to see people get upset when a course is too easy or hard when it’s all about having fun. Slalom needs a ton of support if it's ever to make it into the masses which I have mixed feelings about. I like the club feel we have now but would also like to see this shit on Wide World of Sports someday instead of Curling. (No disrespect intended GBJ).
It doesn't make sense for everyone to quality on one open course.
-
Vlad Popov
- Moscow-Washington
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
-
William Tway
- Timing Guru
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Vista, NY
- Contact:
-
Martin Siegrist
- Airflow-Skateboards
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Liestal, Switzerland
- Contact:
-
Chris Eggers
- Germany
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
AM/Open or PRO
I questioned that a while ago already but with the recent thread in Grüningen, I would like to open the discussion once again, we did not come to a conclusion anyway as I remember, or did we?
Anyway,
Who should race in the Am Class, who in the Pro?
Who is to decide who races where? Should it be up to the competitor himself solely or the organizer? What if a really good racer decides to ride in the AM class? Shoud be be forced to switch to Pro?
Once a Pro, always a Pro?
Anyway,
Who should race in the Am Class, who in the Pro?
Who is to decide who races where? Should it be up to the competitor himself solely or the organizer? What if a really good racer decides to ride in the AM class? Shoud be be forced to switch to Pro?
Once a Pro, always a Pro?