I think this is covered under the current proposal in section 11.1 which outlines a single required official for the race (Head Race Judge) who is responsible for all the on-the-hill decisions.
It allows for further assignment of other race officials.
2008 ISSA Rules update - Contest organizers' responsibility
Moderators: Jonathan Harms, Robert Thiele
-
- Airflow - Skateboards
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
- Contact:
Every decision must be announced to the racers in an obligatory riders meeting.
The riders will have the option to have veto the decision if a clear majority is against the decision.
It is important to have a good communication between organization and the racers.
That can be helped by putting an information board right next to the racers' tent or starting ramp etc.
rmn
The riders will have the option to have veto the decision if a clear majority is against the decision.
It is important to have a good communication between organization and the racers.
That can be helped by putting an information board right next to the racers' tent or starting ramp etc.
rmn
Feel the flow – Airflow Skateboards
Real skateboard wheels come in green – ABEC11
Enjoy the ride – GOG Slalom & DH Trucks
Real skateboard wheels come in green – ABEC11
Enjoy the ride – GOG Slalom & DH Trucks
-
- ISSA President 2011-2024
- Posts: 4702
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Sweden, lives in France
- Contact:
2008 ISSA Rules update - Contest organizers' responsibility
I was thinking we might need a rule to say that the contest organizer always has the last word in case a decision has to be made.
Of course all applicable rules and regulations should be considered, but in the end there might be no other way than to just invent a new role. That rule may even break some existing ISSA rule, but it was the only way forward. Ie in case of rain, in case of dispute, in case of other exceptional, unforeseen circumstances etc.
In that case I think the rules should say that the Contest Organizer can take virtually any decision he considers most appropriate.
If it is abused, or unfortunate decisions are made, there is one kind of punishment that can be applied, the ISSA status committee will be more reluctant to award a high status to the event next year.
Do we need this or not?
/Jani
Of course all applicable rules and regulations should be considered, but in the end there might be no other way than to just invent a new role. That rule may even break some existing ISSA rule, but it was the only way forward. Ie in case of rain, in case of dispute, in case of other exceptional, unforeseen circumstances etc.
In that case I think the rules should say that the Contest Organizer can take virtually any decision he considers most appropriate.
If it is abused, or unfortunate decisions are made, there is one kind of punishment that can be applied, the ISSA status committee will be more reluctant to award a high status to the event next year.
Do we need this or not?
/Jani