World Cup Races on flat surface - not anymore!

general rules, special-tight-giant rules

Moderators: Jonathan Harms, Robert Thiele

Post Reply

World Cup Races on flat surfaces - not anymore?

Yes, move it to a hill
21
72%
No, leave it on the flat
0
No votes
I don't care. It's anyways the same conditions for everybody
8
28%
 
Total votes: 29

Ramón Königshausen
Airflow - Skateboards
Airflow - Skateboards
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

World Cup Races on flat surface - not anymore!

Post by Ramón Königshausen » Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:34 am

The past season we ran a few races on flat or almost flat surfaces; Hannover (Prime) and Antibes (Main) to name only the bigger ones of those races I'm talking about. Hannover luckily had different courses for Amateurs and Pros, but in the Straight Slalom you still had to use your bigger deck (for me the C81, wheelbase 56cm) because it was like 1.80 in the flat. In Antibes, which even had Main Status, I had to use my bigger deck for all three discipines which were called "Giant Slalom", "TIGHT/Straight Slalom" and "Special Slalom". Both, special and straight slalom were held on flat surface, and either of them were for Pros as well as for Amateurs. (Straight, which was also called "tight": 1.80m, won on a big deck/long wheelbase; Special, although a nice course and set by Claude Reginier, also won with a long deck.) Wide cone distances in the flat make it quite hard to accellerate - a guy who's got a very good technique (=high level, good skills) but not that much power to accelerate such a long board in such a wide course on flat surface has no chance against someone that's "only a strong guy".
I'm lucky to be given both, technique and physical strength - though I find a techniqual course on a hill is more interesting to race on, more fun and much more exiting to watch! Skills and not only power are demanding the racers.

Awaiting your opinions...

rmn
Last edited by Ramón Königshausen on Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:54 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Feel the flow – Airflow Skateboards

Real skateboard wheels come in green – ABEC11

Enjoy the ride – GOG Slalom & DH Trucks

Joe Iacovelli
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:00 am
Location: Bristol, CT

Post by Joe Iacovelli » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:07 am

Ramon,

As I was not at the races you mentioned, I do agree that "flat" and slalom do not together except for dead of winter practice.

BUT

I assume your post has something to do with the Grenoble race? I would race flat or uphill to have the chance to compete in Olympic stadium. You do get that, right?

Joe

Claude Regnier
Claude Regnier
Claude Regnier
Posts: 1189
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:00 am
Location: Cornwall, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Flat or Slope

Post by Claude Regnier » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:20 am

I myself was disappointed that 3 events (5 races) we're to be held on flat. In only one case however the organizer did not notify the racers in advance.

In both other situations the organizers had to change venues due to local municipalities changing the parameters or another event had a cancellation and it affected the slalom event that was to be held in conjunction.

In two cases the race promoters notified the racers at the earliest possible time. Unfortunately for me tickets and plans we're already made. It was too late. The personal commitment to travel in 2006 and talk to people about ISSA was just as important as the racing itself.

I heard from a lot of people and have a good feel for what the slalom community wants. I personally would like to at least see one of the two Special or Straight/Tight races be on a slope if there are going to be multiple events. It is better for the racers and certainly for the spectators as well as the sport.

It will be up to the racers to decide what they want to attend. This voting will perhaps lend itself to the Ranking of said race. If racers choose not to go because it features flat then the status will need to be changed or perhaps appointed 30 days before or something like that.

This is an entirely knew topic of discussion which is very valid. I was going to bring it up in the ISSA discussion Forum but then did not want to pull away any of the excitement of the Grenoble event since I was approached about the event while in Antibes.

As statuses will not be given till next year long after ISSA's rules are re-written, everyone will know where they stand. Your vote counts.
Many Happy Pumps!

Ramón Königshausen
Airflow - Skateboards
Airflow - Skateboards
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by Ramón Königshausen » Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:23 am

Joe Iacovelli wrote:Ramon,

I assume your post has something to do with the Grenoble race? I would race flat or uphill to have the chance to compete in Olympic stadium. You do get that, right?

Joe
Yes,I agree on that. That would be an acceptable reason for holding it in the flat. The condition only was: set the course tight enough so that "all those spectators" have something to watch...


rmn
Feel the flow – Airflow Skateboards

Real skateboard wheels come in green – ABEC11

Enjoy the ride – GOG Slalom & DH Trucks

Joe Iacovelli
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:00 am
Location: Bristol, CT

Post by Joe Iacovelli » Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:28 am

Agree

Donald Campbell
Pavel
Pavel
Posts: 2036
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Post by Donald Campbell » Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:02 am

absolutely agree with what ramon says
death to all flatland bs.
grenoble:two races in flat? unacceptable
Last edited by Donald Campbell on Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Chris Eggers
Germany
Germany
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 2:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Chris Eggers » Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:39 am

Like I said before.

Flat is dead.

Flat was in the 70s (1970s that is............)

Donald Campbell
Pavel
Pavel
Posts: 2036
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Post by Donald Campbell » Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:11 pm

the 70's killed slalom sort of...remember the boring contests in germany we had then?
you had to be an absolute enthusiast to dig that stuff.
good example chris!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hackett and his ideas might sometimes be a bit too far-fetched but a good accumulation out of reason and goforit character will drive the sport to bigger attention.

David Rudnianski
LTC
LTC
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Paris/ France
Contact:

Post by David Rudnianski » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:21 pm

I love both flat race and slope race. I agree with you ramon, a non technical race on flat is very boring. All race should be technical. for example somebody of my weight is penalized in large flat course.
As I say in an other topic, we should alternate flat and slope, but technical flat.
What we will try to do this season for our Pirate Champ is to alternate all type of slalom... small slope, bigger slope, flat and maybe ditch and full pipe. I thing a good skateboarder should be good in each categorys ;)
French Pirates are in the place...
www.riderz.net
http://pirateslalom.online.fr/
Politic Longboard Activist...

alavoine jean paul
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: paris

Post by alavoine jean paul » Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:18 pm

Flat should be for freestyle only!
jean paul aka POPOL:
"I was born yesterday...
but I stayed up all night!"

John Gilmour
Team Roe Racing
Team Roe Racing
Posts: 1207
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:00 am
Location: USA

We all look like crap on flat - except Simon Levene

Post by John Gilmour » Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:28 am

Flat is okay only if you are on exkate power boards that can go 40mph

Only Simon Levene can make flat look good. He is the only one with massive accelleration so he can make flat look like a hill in 4 cones.

I have never had any interest in flat anything.

On flat we are limited by our pumping speeds.... which quite frankly on flat are not all that impressive.

The only think I think is notable about flatland slalom is that we are able to do it at all. Same for inline slalom. If you held ski races on flat and or on beginner slopes with nearly no pitch so that the racers were going as fast as we went on slalom boards on flat... would you bother to stay and watch for more than 5 minutes? I think we would think it was pretty stupid looking...like imagine we came across a snakeboard race on flat... we wouldn't bother to watch...we would likely even make fun of it.

But if we saw a snakeboard race on a hill with them charging 35 + mph...we would watch (perhaps just for carnage) but it would at least be interesting. you'd still have the rush of a human beaing whizzing by you fast. Even Inline slalom at speeds over 30mph...hmmm wait a sec...maybe 45 mph is interesting to watch.

Leave flatland for the really good Korean flatland freestyle slalom inline and roller skaters..

If you let a promoter convince slalomers to run on flat- then he might push for a smaller area,,,then a bad surface- and perhaps into the wind... in the effort to get twice the spectators we just end up boring more than half of them.

Flat is ok for practice... nothing more. Some famous guy said that...
One good turn deserves another
john gilmour

Post Reply