Page 1 of 1
2009 Rules Update - Overall
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:06 pm
by Jani Soderhall
With the current system of 100, 80, 60 it's too easy to obtain equal placing.
Ideally the distance between 1st and 2nd should be bigger than between 2nd and 3rd.
/Jani
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:01 pm
by Ramón Königshausen
I agree, because when you place 3rd you're sort of equal to the 2nd place because both have the same amount of wins and losses.
rmn
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:36 pm
by Pat Chewning
Do you have a specific points chart that you would like to use instead of the existing points chart?
For example, would you like 2nd place to be 75pts and leave the rest of the chart alone?
1st place = 100 7th place = 36 13th place = 20 19th place = 12 25th place = 6
2nd place = 80 8th place = 32 14th place = 18 20th place = 11 26th place = 5
3rd place = 60 9th place = 29 15th place = 16 21st place = 10 27th place = 4
4th place = 50 10th place = 26 16th place = 15 22nd place = 9 28th place = 3
5th place = 45 11th place = 24 17th place = 14 23rd place = 8 29th place = 2
6th place = 40 12th place = 22 18th place = 13 24th place = 7 30th place = 1
31st place =0; 32nd place = -1 ; 33rd place = -2 ; Points decrement by 1pt per place
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:57 am
by Jani Soderhall
I'm not smart enough to come with the solutions on these situations. I'm just posting topics that could be discussed.
/Jani