Ridden a RoeRacing deck...post a review!

Brian Morris · Post by **Brian Morris** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 2:56 am

was it the picture, or the suit that was from 1975???

TheBrain

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 2:37 am

its its its like andy gibb meets flock of seagulls meets a young John Mcinroe. Kind of makes me horny in a wierd way.T

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 2:26 am

are we speechless over...???

a) the hair
b) the glasses
c) the "skateboard"?
d) all of the above

[ This Message was edited by: Chris Stepanek on 2003-04-16 20:28 ]

Adam Trahan · Post by **Adam Trahan** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 2:06 am

On 2003-04-16 19:55, Terence Kirby wrote:
For once, I am speechless.

Me too, 'nuff said.

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 1:55 am

For once, I am speechless.

Vlad Popov · Post by **Vlad Popov** » Thu Apr 17, 2003 1:38 am

Dear Terence,
It doesn’t matter how ugly my board is.

First, I make everything look good.
Second, it’s the function that counts.

Vlad.

PS. You call a Roe ugly one more time, I’m telling Gareth!
PPS. When I saw this CALI 1975 track suit, I had to have it right away! If Gilmour were with me shopping I’m sure he’d approve!

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Wed Apr 16, 2003 7:10 pm

Vlad, I hear your new board is very ugly. Can you post a pic so that we may see for ourselves?

Vlad Popov · Post by **Vlad Popov** » Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:46 pm

I got a new Roe right before the Luna race. It is based on the Bullet shape, has the same nose as the Bullet and a square tail, and the waist is constant thoughout the entire length at 18.5 cm. (7 1/4 inch). I’ll post a couple of pictures when I get my super-duuper Digi cam.

I’ve tested a couple of Roes before and liked them somewhat. However, every Roe I tried lacked dampening. It was like a spring, very powerful and violent. Not that it’s a bad thing, just not as comfortable as, say, a Turner Hybrid/GS.

The new Roe is VERY different. It’s more damp. It feels good under the foot.
Mine turned out to be on a soft side. I ordered a Medium flex for my 160 lbs. I could have benefited more from Medium-Stiff.

Camber is very low, like 3/8 of an inch, the board looks and feels flat. It’s deceptive, really, because the camber gets loaded and works pretty good.

The reason I ordered a Roe was to help me beat 8-second barrier on the Cyber Slalom course. I believe the caber loading/unloading will allow me to shave off at least .1 second off my current best time.
You see, 6 feet is a lot of distance between the cones on flat ground. It’s not really a tight slalom, so there is plenty of time to load and unload the camber. Flexy boards do MUCH better on this course. It has been empirically proven many times. The timer will tell. Hopefully this week.

It took me a couple of runs to feel at home on the board in Jackson, MS. The apex of the camber could be 2-3 inches closer to the nose. My front foot was favoring the middle of the board for getting the maximum snap/response. The back end is perfect. I like my pumping foot right over the rear truck for the maximum traction. The width is too much, in my opinion; I should have gotten a 1/2-inch narrower board for my size 9 US feet. (6 3/4)

Gareth was very responsive and enthusiastic about building me a board. It was an honor to take it to the podium.

Thanks, Mr. Roe!

Superior shape (Plankk-R) meets superior technology (RoeRacing). Even a beginner rider (that would be me) can climb the Red Bull podiums (that’s in MS). Must be the board!

My new graphite toy is superb. Pictures are coming soon.

Vlad.

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Tue Mar 04, 2003 2:11 am

Vlad, if you scroll up to the two roe decks the one next to gareths white one is what I am sending you to try. I know you hate cut aways but just try it for flex . I couldnt ship it today because my knee was too stiff to drive but I should be able to do it tomorrow. TK

Vlad Popov · Post by **Vlad Popov** » Mon Mar 03, 2003 11:09 pm

TK, thanks!
I'm looking for the function in the shape. To each his own, the bullet shape seems the right shape to me.
Looking forward to riding a Roe soon!
Vlad.

PS I'm still staying tuned...after all these years

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Thu Feb 27, 2003 6:54 pm

Vlad, I can't be specific but what I can say is the 2003 boards will have even better flex and snap, more consistant fit and finish, more functional race shapes,and a fast turn around time for orders. One of the biggest problems Roe had last year was the amount of time it took to get a board, and while they are worth the wait we understand how frustrating this can be for a customer.Our team is busy testing new shapes right now. It wont be long before you can see and feel what I mean. Tk

Vlad Popov · Post by **Vlad Popov** » Tue Feb 25, 2003 11:57 pm

In the light of the Grand News from the new Turner Summer Ski company, this is a good day to make a couple of lil' announcements:

First, I'm interested in test-riding a Roe and posting a review more then even.

Second,
TK! I can't stay tuned anymore!!!! What is it?!! WHAT? WHAT????

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:31 am

There are some great things about to happen at Roe Racing. Stay Tuned! TK

Claude Regnier · Post by **Claude Regnier** » Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:40 pm

Kevin, I had the chance to ride the Unlimited the day TK received it from Gareth. (I think it may have been the Prototype PVD or both)

I find them comparable as TK's board is a little softer then my BR. Accelerating was quicker but (Unlimited) I don't think over the length of that particular course there was any difference in my times. That would have been interesting to note. We will do that for you soon.

As far as the shape the extra room on the nose (Unlimited) was nice and would make the board a better all around model. Having been used to ridding Turner Cutaways for the last 20 years I feel comfortable with the smaller area under my front foot. I really don't notice it very much when you get right down to it.

[ This Message was edited by: Claude Regnier on 2003-02-20 16:53 ]

Paul Keleher · Post by **Paul Keleher** » Tue Feb 18, 2003 11:08 am

I've had a litle time on my Unlimited now, Not had the opportunity to run through any cones as yet, the weather in the UK has been...unfavourable!!

After a few discussions with Gareth, a stiff version was determined to be best for my weight ( 235lb)...

When the package finally arrived, i removed all of the hardware from my G&S Response 4ply (RT-x/s & stingers) and fitted it to the Unlimited, this way i could gain an impression of the deck only..

First impressions...WOW..its a slick looking piece of Kit, Thanks Gareth!!..it's a little flexier than my Response, but it is 2" longer so that was to be expected, and only just flexes to flat under my weight.

just by pumping along the flats it seems to rocket forward, it snaps out of turns much quicker than my response.

Looking foreward to some better weather so i can run some cones on a decent surface!

Terry Kirby · Post by **Terry Kirby** » Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:16 am

Kevin, The unlimited is built on the original bottle rocker chassis. The nose was filled in where the cut away is and the wheel base is a tad longer. We are tweaking them with every batch and will be making the tail a smidge wider(thanks noah) on the 2003 models. The deck is comfortable at speed and good on most courses. I still have my original prototype and have used it in eveything from the G burg cyberslalom to the Boston 4th of july TS, to Brecks GS and hybred to both days at La Costa. Hope this helped. TK

Scott Yano · Post by **Scott Yano** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:27 am

I had the luxury of a broken arm while I waited for my Bottle rocket to arrive. I did tell Gareth that it was no rush.

I got the board in July (a bottle rocket mounted complete with seismics and stingers) and have been waiting 'til my arm felt like it could take an impact. It still doesn't feel 100%, but...

This weekend I lit up a rocket for the first time. The area just behind the front truck feels really flat and solid through the first couple of cones (this maybe because of the centering of the Seismics, I'm not sure), then the board just explodes. I remembered what Curt Kimbel had said months ago at ncdsa about the sweet spot by the sticker and found good footing quickly. He was absolutely right: you hit the thing in the right spot and it takes off. The smoothness of the flex pattern is very clear, and it seems like you can fire it up and turn it down at will. I love that Seismic up front combined with the flex of the nose--it doesn't feel like it'll "buckle" under at any point. The back end was a bit loose and whippy, and I can feel that I should crank it down a notch or two (if I had an allen wrench that fit). I'm looking forward to trying it with an offset out back to see what it's like.

It's a bit short for free riding, but Gareth double drilled mine, so I'll check it out with the longer wheelbase soon. It feels like you could feel pretty confident charging a bigger hill, but that remains to be seen (by me at least).

Anyway, I'm impressed. I'd love to be able to try everything out there, but for now this'll do just fine. (my four year old is obsessed with paddling around on one knee on it--he won't use any of the other boards around--good taste, I guess. I literally had to pry it from his fingers to ride it).

I can't wait to get back out on it again...
Scott

Sean Dawkins · Post by **Sean Dawkins** » Mon Dec 09, 2002 8:12 pm

[ This Message was edited by: Sean Dawkins on 2003-02-25 20:11 ]

Paul Keleher · Post by **Paul Keleher** » Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:45 pm

oh well...serves me right for not reading Gareths other postings properly....

the Br is 28.5" the unlimited 30"

i must read all posts
i must read all posts
i must read all posts

Paul Keleher · Post by **Paul Keleher** » Thu Dec 05, 2002 10:14 am

What are the Actual correct dimensions for the BR, Hester, Nina etc.

thr Roe site says that the BR is 30" and the stinger is 31", but looking at the picture of Gareths boards, i would say the BR is more like 28.5"

Given that the unlimited is also listed as 30", but is based on the BR ,is it really less

Somebody please get the tape measure out, because i want to know before i buy one! an unlimited that is...and maybe a BR!!

Claude Regnier · Post by **Claude Regnier** » Thu Dec 05, 2002 5:22 am

What can you say. You really got to ride one to appreciate the feel. I can't wait till I can complete my quiver.

My Bottle Rocket is just perfect for true TS but for most of the FCR races you need choices. Most courses aren't tight enough. I'm sure the Bonita will likely be my board of choice for most open type courses.

The response and power one can generate is second to none. Try it before you buy if you like but at least if your ridding a Roe and your good enough you'll have a chance to win.

Snow, snow go away.

Kevin M. Gamble · Post by **Kevin M. Gamble** » Wed Dec 04, 2002 5:43 pm

I'm curious to hear the differences between the Bottle Rocket and the Unlimited, especially since I think that the Unlimited was derived from the Bottle Rocket shape. Has anybody ridden both? TK?

Paul Keleher · Post by **Paul Keleher** » Wed Dec 04, 2002 3:10 pm

I would be curious to know what Wheelbase drillings have been selected for various models...

for example, check out gareths BR and compare it to Tway's

Tways appears to be drilled closer to the nose than Gareth's.

Noah Heinle · Post by **Noah Heinle** » Tue Sep 24, 2002 7:50 pm

My new Roe "Unlimited" has quickly replaced my other race boards. I have it set up with a rad pad and RTX in front and a TTC in back set low and wedged *very* slightly with a cut pad. I Think bushings are key to any setup for a specific rider. TK suggested a while ago that when tweaking bushings, use the harder of the two on top. This rule of thumb that has been working for me all summer. I have a soft (old) blue tracker on the bottom and a (new) bones blue hardcore on top in the front. In the TTC, I have a yellow stimulator on the bottom and a yellow hardcore on top.

This board snaps like no other. I like a lot of boards (who doesn't?!) But in the six weeks I've had it, the unlimited seems to me to be the most versatile. Big GS or tightish, it'll buck ya, if you're not careful!

Curt Kimbel · Post by **Curt Kimbel** » Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:36 am

My Roe has held up beautifully. I have raced it regularly for 8 months, and have riden in practice dozens of days. It looks and feels like new.

In particular, it is very light and snaps back quickly after each turn. As others mentioned, it is very comfortable to ride, feels good at high speed, and has no unusual or quirky traits.

I ran my Roe Wide Tail Bottle Rocket (not sure how many are out there) with Seismic front/Indy rear for several months. It worked great. I recently set it up with Tracker RacerX up front, TTC rear. The Racer X was immedieatly comfortable, the TTC required some bushing changes to get it dialed in. I always use a red rad pad front and rear.

I'll let you know if I run across any further improvements.

Adam Trahan · Post by **Adam Trahan** » Fri Sep 06, 2002 11:00 pm

I now have a RoeRacing "Unlimited" set up with a Seismic 110mm flat front, TTC 101mm rear (set to 110mm with Tracker Aluminum Spacers) with a Tracker Wedge to take out steering. Oust Moc 7 bearings (with proper spacers) in Turner Cambria wheels.

Since this is a "brand" new board for me, I am going to ride it for a while before I post my riding/technique impressions (editing this post at that time)

The TTC and the Cambrias are also new equipment to me so it would not be a fair evaluation for me to go on about the Roe "Unlimited" until I understand the TTC and or the Cambria's effect on what I understand.

What I can say from experience using first and second generation Turners (classic Fullnose - Cutaway) and a couple of Blackbirds, Santa Cruz Graphite Loadeds and custom G&S boards over many years is that the Roe has a quality build and a "return" that feels fast. It's not like a spring potential, it is a progressive return. The rebound "energy" of the board seems quick (mine is a MED) and I ordered a stiff profile. I was told by Gareth that this particular model has stiff qualities in regards to flex profiles. It feels stiff but contains a usable quick returning flex profile.

(Obviously this is all my own opinion)

Anyway, I like the board after zig zagging on a great street (excellent asphalt surface) and will run cone with it soon. It will be one choice out of my quiver for the Morro Bay competition, or running local with our group. The "Unlimited" is racked next to my White Turner Cutaway and my 36" Pocket Pistol Super G.

Thank you Gareth for contributing to the slalom racing board market.

Gotta have the Arizona flag, included.

[ This Message was edited by: adam trahan on 2002-09-10 20:33 ]

Henry Hester · Post by **Henry Hester** » Thu Sep 05, 2002 7:55 pm

Here is a photo of my board. It is a Nina Hester Model with Sesimics on the front, Indy Offset on the back The seismic has a wedge the Indy is mounted with a small flat block. Like my friend William, I have found that the Seismic can be ridden in all events with no problem and I confir with all his comments above.

Those are cut down Avalons and although I love the feeling of these quick reaction narrow wheels, my performance was not where I wanted it to be at Hood River. Part of that was the roll factor. Hackett just rolled right on by with stock Avalons. I thought the wheels might be deforming (slowing) a little. Talked to Howard about it. Maybe I'll run the harder ones all around (current set up is hardfront soft rear), also cut narrow like this. I've tried Cambrias but they seem too sticky for my blood.

William Tway · Post by **William Tway** » Thu Sep 05, 2002 7:35 pm

<img src=http://www.users.cloud9.net/~wbtway/roesetup.jpg>

The Roe Bottle Rocket is an excellent shape for TS racing. I have set mine up with German Seismics (Silver Springs) in front. They turn fast and snap right back to center. Even set "loose" you can bomb a hill on this board with complete confidence.

I thought this set-up was only good for TS but after running it on the GS course at da' farm, I am now convinced it can be used for virtually any style of course.

Mine is also very stiff which I believe gives a rider more push/thrust/snap as you pass each cone. If a deck is too flexy, it takes too long to snap back and is easy to get out of position.

<img src=http://www.users.cloud9.net/~wbtway/roesetup1.jpg>

The tail is set-up with a Turner TTC which provides excellent traction and control. JG considers this overkill but it works for me.

The Turner Cambria wheels are by far the best wheels I have ever ridden. Hands Down.

Overall, this is my favorite board in my quiver. I ride it as often as possible and hope to someday beat TK on it.

[ This Message was edited by: william tway on 2002-09-05 13:47 ]

Gareth Roe · Post by **Gareth Roe** » Thu Sep 05, 2002 6:43 pm

Glenn-
Per your excellent suggestion, I have posted a few photos of my various race set-ups.

This first photo shows the difference between Henry's two models, The Nina or HesterTS on the left and the regular Hester on the right. Both of them are set up with Seismic 110's and Abec 11 Stinger Wheels.

The second photo is of two of my personal race boards (the Bonita is not shown). On the left is the Stinger/GS that is usually set up with a Seismic 135 (stock red springs) up front and a Tracker RT-S custom off-set in the rear (not shown). It has an inner truck hole to inner truck hole dimension of 21.75".

The board on the right is a Bottle Rocket set up for a tight slalom course with a Seismic 110 (stock yellow springs) up front and an Indy 101 custom off-set in the rear. It has an inner truck hole to inner truck hole dimension of 18.75". The wheels on this particular board are shaved (skinnier) Abec 11 Stingers - 92a up front and 88a in the rear. Both boards have the rear trucks mounted flat on an 1/8th inch riser and the front trucks mounted with a slight (5*) wedge, skinny side forward for increased turning.

I usually will pick my race-day wheels depending on the surface conditions of the race course. I use Pleasure Tool Ceramic bearings with the proper spacers in all my wheels.

Getting a board dialed in for racing is like breaking in a pair of new slippers. Everyone is going to do it a little differently and the end results may be different from one racer to another. I start out with a proven basic combination of parts and will keep on making changes and adjustments to the board, trucks, bushings, and wheels, until it feels just right! And when it feels right, you will know. There is nothing like a high performance race board that is tuned for the maximum amount of traction and to go fast!

I hope this helps provide some insight into how my race boards are actually set up. Please feel free to ask if you have anymore questions.

See you at the races!
Gareth

[ This Message was edited by: Gareth Roe on 2002-09-05 13:46 ]

Glenn S · Post by **Glenn S** » Thu Sep 05, 2002 5:34 am

I would like to ask to see some pictures of real users setups including team riders. How they configure the trucks placement and wheels and what works best for who and maybe even a little note on why they chose that setup. You gotta have some pictures of some of the setups that have raced in the recent races. Could you host the pictures on your website so they stick around for awhile. Maybe that could get some discussion going here. This goes for other board maker discussion groups here as well.
Thanks,
Glenn

[ This Message was edited by: Glenn on 2002-10-05 23:16 ]

Gareth Roe · Post by **Gareth Roe** » Wed Sep 04, 2002 6:17 pm

Hello Racers-
If you own one of our decks or have just had an opportunity to ride one - please post a review.

Tell us which model you rode and what your initial impressions were. Tell us something about how you have it set up - what wheelbase you are running, what trucks, wheels, bushings, risers, etc... We are also looking for long-term reviews. Some of you guys have had decks for almost 8 months - how are they holding up? Are they still snappy and as alive as they were when you first got them?

If you have pictures of your RoeRacing deck and want them posted here, e-mail them to me at info@roeslalom.com and I will get them posted.

And last, please tell us what we can/should be doing different (no egos to bruise here). We are always striving to make the boards better and you guys are our best source of information.

Thanks for your input!
Sincerely
Gareth

[ This Message was edited by: Gareth Roe on 2002-09-05 13:50 ]

Join the ISSA 25-cone series. 5 international sessions per year.
Create your own local race. Discover slalom skateboarding now!
Race weekends Autumn 2025:

September, 26th, 27th, 28th, and 29th
November, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, and 24th.

| World Ranking | 25-cone Series | Calendar