Not fair...in that case Mig would win every time.Hans Koraeus wrote:Skating has nothing to do with rules.
Rules are only for competitions where you want to select a winner.
In my rules the winner is the one having most fun.

Not fair...in that case Mig would win every time.Hans Koraeus wrote:Skating has nothing to do with rules.
Rules are only for competitions where you want to select a winner.
In my rules the winner is the one having most fun.
I agree completely.......sorry to add to it...just addressing the comments.Donald Campbell wrote:maybe some things(take the pic as an example)should just be done without the neverending discussions.
it is good to have democracy but sometimes things just need to be done without all the discussions-a waste of time
Yes. My intent was not to discuss this, but just a plea for people to submit some pics and then I would choose one.Donald Campbell wrote:maybe some things(take the pic as an example)should just be done without the neverending discussions.
it is good to have democracy but sometimes things just need to be done without all the discussions-a waste of time
Huh well, with flawless I meant I couldn't detect any issues on that. Have there been any?Hans Koraeus wrote: Ramòn, I don't want to believe that you really mean that such a system is good, that one might think that you really meant. You say flawless, hmm. I have more trust in Jani's observation which fits more into my own experience. And even if it was flawless it would have been no more than a stroke of luck than anything else.
By the way Rick, we have copied MB's Card System but felt that we did not have enough experience using it during the Worlds. We will be working with it some this year in preparation of next years races. Our cards were the one's used at the US Nationals in August. (Gary Saenz put our cards together..thanks Gary).Rick Floyd wrote:He's showing DQ.
Claude had a great system at Dovercourt this year. Each cone marshall had a large "notebook" style pad with BIG black numbers on a white background. There were also a totally RED page and a totally GREEN page. The numbers were for number of cones hit in that marshall's section, so the officials at the top just had to add up the numbers on each course. If a marshall's section was clean they held up the green page, if they had a DQ they held up the red page. Easy to see and easy to count!
I think it did, and only thanks to a very experienced racer/cone counter up at the top.Ramón Königshausen wrote:If I'm not mistaken, the cone counting at this year's World Championships was done like this and it worked flawlessly.
If I'm not mistaken, the cone counting at this year's World Championships was done like this and it worked flawlessly.Hans Koraeus wrote:I would say it would be a good picture in the section of how not to handle cone counting at an ISSA event...
I would say it would be a good picture in the section of how not to handle cone counting at an ISSA event...
That's the kind of look that gets books banned in Boston.Rick Floyd wrote:Perfect!!William Tway wrote:http://i6.tinypic.com/7xnpll1.jpg
Perfect!!William Tway wrote:http://i6.tinypic.com/7xnpll1.jpg