Gary Fluitt wrote:Mig, I couldn't agree more. The ISSA can really only focus on a handful of large events sort of like the IGSA does for downhill. But those large events are failing because there isn't a constant feed of new skaters to fill the ranks. Why is there not enough of a base of skaters to feed the 6 or 8 big events?
I think I have addressed it in my previous post: money. If I was a top racer and given my geographic location, I would need an annual budget of $10,000, at the very least, to attend all the 6 or so big ISSA events and collect a maximum number of points (if that is why you race for, but that's another story...). How many racers can afford that, plus the time off from the real job to travel? And how many have good enough sponsors to pay for all of that? I have no idea what kind of help other sponsored riders get, but I know I'm doing all I can to help the Fullbag team get to those races. Including not going myself if it means more travel money for them.
Gary Fluitt wrote:Its not for a lack of little races, or outlaws. There are more of those now then there ever was. In Colorado, there is a session every weekend! Problem is, no one new is coming to those sessions.
But what is done locally to attract new people to those local races/sessions? I'm certainly not saying that you guys are not doing anything or are doing it wrong. I'm honestly asking. We have anywhere from 3 to 7 sessions a week that are posted on our local frenchie forum. Pics and vids from those sessions are posted, and this is important and in direct relation with the number of people who show up. The more media we post, the more people show up. We started with 3 skaters per session five years ago and now we're as many as 12 to 15 skaters at least once in the week. When we know noobs and less advance skaters are going to show, we don't go for the fastest spot and hardest courses to discourage them. "GNAR", "B.A.R.", "speed" and "tech" may sound cool and core on the forums and at the big races for more advanced riders, but I guaranty you it doesn't make a newbie come back for a second session when he can't make most of the course or see quick improvements after a few tries. Also having our local Pro and older experienced slalomers get totally involved with noobs and answering every single question about technique, gear adjustment, skate history, and more on the forums and at the sessions is primordial. Even if they repeat the same things a hundred times, they will do it again to help a new guy get hooked.
I've seen advice posted to newbies from a BOD member about beginning to slalom with 4' spacing. That's not the way to attract new people but the perfect one to turn them off.
Gary Fluitt wrote:I think slalom is just not as appealing as other opportunities in skating (downhill for instance). Occasionally we hook a kid like Martin Reaves who becomes the phenom du jour, but that's happening less and less in slalom and our numbers appear to be on the decline.
Like I posted before, making slalom look visually appealing can be done but practically no one takes the time to do it. And every newbie can't possibly turn into Martin! (On a side note: Man! Racing him at the 2007 Worlds was the best time I ever had!!!

) Maybe the focus shouldn't be purely on winning and performance, but on improving yourself and, most of all, having
fun. I know that's what we emphasize on around here.
Gary Fluitt wrote:I think we need to work on the format of the sport for one thing. We can't keep slalom in the 70's if we want skaters of this generation to embrace it. Chasing plastic cones around and calculating a winner after penalties, hasn't changed in over 30 years.
We need to make racing more fun, more simple, and more inviting. More fun would be a great start. I like Fatboy's comment about the actual racing format. a qualifying run and two elims. That sucks. The A/B/C brackets totally helps that be more competitive, but double elimination, or triple elimination, THAT would be fun. You get to race more people. Thats why we travel to races anyway right? So we can race someone new we don't see every other weekend. We can't get there (more racing) if we're spending the majority of our time finding, counting, replacing, and then rerunning because the cone was out.
Totally agree with most of that. But I don't see getting rid of the cones has happening soon. Snowboarders and skiers still have to deal with gates and flags that have to be re-attached. One way to make it simpler is eliminating the cone penalties and just use a somewhat low maximum number of cone hits for DQ. But then again, tech courses usually means more cone hits so more DQs, so a compromise has to be done somewhere.
Gary Fluitt wrote:We also can't get to the more fun more race format if we can't depend on the bloody timer to work every time. That's got to get fixed too.
Well, there's some ways to make that better. But next time I travel to a race to find out a timing system held with scotchtape, raw wire and stuff like this:

I ASK FOR A F@CKIN REFUND!!!
