Slalomspot.com overhaul
-
- Slalomspot.com
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: North America
- Contact:
-
- Slalomspot.com
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: North America
- Contact:
*Air-mails Cookie*
Unless of course, you want a medal?
I used Fireworks and Dreamweaver for this although I have photoshop.
I will probably do something sleaker like my other site http://krants.net
Unless of course, you want a medal?
I used Fireworks and Dreamweaver for this although I have photoshop.
I will probably do something sleaker like my other site http://krants.net
BOSTON BAKED BEAN
HONORARY TEXAS OUTLAW
HONORARY TEXAS OUTLAW
-
- Moscow-Washington
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
-
- WesE
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: northern Virginia, suburb of DC, USA
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 3:15 am
- Location: G'burg, MD, USA
- Contact:
-
- ISSA President 2011-2024
- Posts: 4702
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Sweden, lives in France
- Contact:
Karl,
I took one of the pictures from your site, the one of Bryan Werner and made a re-sizing test.
First I reduced the height & width of the picture as it was higher than my screen size. It was done while preserving the proportions (so that the image would not be distorted). The image width was reduced from approximately 600 pixels to 400. Resizing the pictures like this does a lot for the size reduction (on disk).
Then I resaved the picture with '60' as the compression/quality factor using Photoshop's "Save for web" menu option.
The result is that the size of the picture is now 64 kb rather than 528 kb - almost 10 times smaller.
The larger image sizes (like 500 kb or more) are only necessary when printing images. Images that should display on web pages should probably not be more than 100 kb.
Let us know what kind of imaging software you have and we'll try to help you get started with your image resizing.
PS. I also found it difficult to locate the menu on top of the board. Making that menu more visible will encourage people to visit every part of your site.
/Jani
Here's the resized picture of Bryan Werner:

I took one of the pictures from your site, the one of Bryan Werner and made a re-sizing test.
First I reduced the height & width of the picture as it was higher than my screen size. It was done while preserving the proportions (so that the image would not be distorted). The image width was reduced from approximately 600 pixels to 400. Resizing the pictures like this does a lot for the size reduction (on disk).
Then I resaved the picture with '60' as the compression/quality factor using Photoshop's "Save for web" menu option.
The result is that the size of the picture is now 64 kb rather than 528 kb - almost 10 times smaller.
The larger image sizes (like 500 kb or more) are only necessary when printing images. Images that should display on web pages should probably not be more than 100 kb.
Let us know what kind of imaging software you have and we'll try to help you get started with your image resizing.
PS. I also found it difficult to locate the menu on top of the board. Making that menu more visible will encourage people to visit every part of your site.
/Jani
Here's the resized picture of Bryan Werner:

-
- WesE
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: northern Virginia, suburb of DC, USA
-
- Slalomspot.com
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Slalomspot.com overhaul
Some time this month I am planning on overhauling the site to something better. If anyone has any suggestions, I'd love to hear them. http://www.slalomspot.com
BOSTON BAKED BEAN
HONORARY TEXAS OUTLAW
HONORARY TEXAS OUTLAW